Whoa, just as I am about to take a month off from blogging, thinking summer doldrums and all, the Birther v. Birther case, Liberi v. Taitz has turned very hot. I made an update this morning to a post about Orly Taitz’s War On Court Clerks, related to this filing by her in Liberi v. Taitz:
07/29/2010 136 RESPONSE to the 7/26/10 Emergency MOTION by the plffs to keep transcripts under seal and motion for clarification and motion-reuqest for oer to show cause, why sanctions should not be assessed against parties defrauding the courts, etc., filed by ORLY TAITZ. (Attachments: # 1 Part 2)(gn, ) (Entered: 07/29/2010)
Well, here is Berg’s response to that:
07/30/2010 137 [RECAP] REPLY to Response to Motion re 135[RECAP] Emergency MOTION for Clarification or in the Alternative Motion for Reconsideration Memorandum; and Certificate of Service filed by EVELYN ADAMS, PHILIP J. BERG, GO EXCEL GLOBAL, LISA LIBERI, LISA M. OSTELLA, THE LAW OFFICES OF PHILIP J. BERG. (BERG, PHILIP) (Entered: 07/30/2010)
07/26/2010 135 Emergency MOTION for Clarification or in the Alternative Motion for Reconsideration filed by EVELYN ADAMS, PHILIP J. BERG, GO EXCEL GLOBAL, LISA LIBERI, LISA M. OSTELLA, THE LAW OFFICES OF PHILIP J. BERG.Memorandum of Law; Proposed Order; and Certificate of Service. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(BERG, PHILIP) (Entered: 07/26/2010)
Lisa Liberi is under a domestic protection order of some sort against an ex-spouse, as well as I can gather, living to some extent anonymously and in possible danger from that man. This didn’t stop Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq. yesterday from posting to her website* a photograph of Lisa Liberi, and asking her flying monkeys to dig up information on Liberi, which she will no doubt make public. Orly Taitz is a real piece of fly-covered shit that way. She’s publicized Liberi’s Social Security Number again and again and again, even sending it to her email list. Blech.
Ed Hale has decided to help out by posting the photo to his own forum and asking:
Do you know who this is?
Someone sent me this picture and I have no idea who it is. tell me if you know who it is.
So “someone” sent him the picture? Ed Hale was face to face with Lisa Liberi in a Philadelphia courtroom last summer, when Orly Taitz left him swinging in the breeze and he had to do his own cross-examination of the other side. But he has “no idea” who it is in the photo. I swear, if there is a bigger bunch of liars than Birthers, I haven’t run into them.
This is from Taitz’s post with the photo on her website*:
This is Lisa Liberi, who was convicted in CA in 2008 of 10 counts of forgery and theft
Posted on | July 30, 2010 | No Comments
This is a picture of Lisa Liberi, who was convicted in CA in 2008. there were 23 charges, she was convicted in 10. She got 8 years prison term, which was reduced to probation. According to the terms of her probation she is allowed to live only in CA or NM, she is not allowed to live in any other state. This woman assists Attorney Philip Berg with preparation of documents. …
A year ago this woman appeared in the courtroom in Philadelphia, PA and claimed that she is a different person. All the pleadings and documents are filed below in PDF files. …
I also need anyone with knowledge about this woman to contact me at 949-683-5411
* Just as pointed out in Plaintiffs’ previous filings, Defendant Orly Taitz is stalking Lisa Liberi; her son; Lisa Ostella; and Lisa Ostella’s children.
* Defendant Taitz has threatened to destroy Plaintiff Liberi and get rid of her, which Defendant Taitz in one of her filings with this Court has admitted; Defendant Orly Taitz has also threatened to have Plaintiff Lisa Ostella’s children professionally kidnapped; and on June 25, 2009 drove around where Plaintiff Ostella and her family reside and where Plaintiff Ostella’s children attend school. See Affidavit of Charles Edward Lincoln, III previously filed with this Court.
* Defendant Orly Taitz’s has obtained the photographs of the Plaintiffs Lisa Liberi; Lisa Ostella; their husbands and children, by her (Defendant Orly Taitz) own admissions to this Court.
* The picture that Defendant Taitz filed with her July 28, 2010 Response, was only located on Plaintiff Liberi’s computer. NO one else had possession of this photo, and that is why Defendant Taitz and Defendant Neil Sankey only have a black and white print-out copy. The only way Defendant Taitz and Sankey could have come into possession of this photo is if they in fact illegally entered Plaintiff Liberi’s computer and illegally downloaded it. Suspicions of Defendants Taitz and Sankey illegally entering Plaintiff Liberi and Plaintiff Ostella’s computer have already been turned over to the FBI and local enforcement on previous occasions. This picture in question is now all over the Internet, for no legitimate purpose.
* Defendant Taitz attempted to hire Ruben N[redacted--OFGS], a convicted felon with convictions of Aggravated Assault as well as other crimes for no apparent legitimate purpose” or “for obvious violence against the Plaintiffs herein. Ruben N[redacted--OFGS] on two [2] separate occasions attempted to get paid $25,000.00 from Orly [Defendant Edgar Hale’s website] Taitz through PayPal, on May 25, 2009, see EXHIBIT “1” and May 29, 2009, see EXHIBIT “2”.
* It is important for this Court to note the requests for payment by Ruben N[redacted--OFGS], were done with three [3] consecutive requests sent simultaneously, two [2] in the amount of $8,000; one [1] in the amount of $9,000 totaling $25,000.00, to keep the amounts under $10,000.00 which are automatically reported to the Federal Government pursuant to the Patriot Act.
* Due to the facts that Defendant Taitz’s behaviors have now escalated to an extremely dangerous level against the Plaintiff, their husbands and children, e.g. Felony Stalking across state lines and what appears to be Defendant Taitz’s attempt to hire an individual with a violent background to physically harm Lisa Liberi; her son and husband; as well as Lisa Ostella and her children, it is imperative that this Court refer this matter to the United States Attorney’s Office or the United States Department of Justice immediately, before one of the Plaintiffs’ are physically hurt and/or killed.
* Plaintiff Liberi is not a resident or citizen of the State of California as Defendant Orly Taitz falsely claims, nor is Plaintiff Liberi a resident or citizen of the State of Texas.
* Defendants Orly Taitz and Neil Sankey only want verification of Plaintiff Liberi’s actual residency in order to carry out their violent, serious threats to destroy and get rid of Plaintiff Liberi. The entire docketing system of this case gets published all over the Internet by Defendant Taitz.
This Court must refer this matter to the U.S. Attorney’s Office and/or U.S.
Department of Justice for immediate investigation into the illegal behaviors of Defendants Orly Taitz and Neil Sankey, including but not limited to: Felony Stalking, across state lines; Felony Harassment across state lines; Threat to destroy and get rid of Plaintiff Liberi, across state lines; Threat to professionally kidnap Plaintiff Ostella’s children, across state lines; attempt to hire an individual to do bodily harm upon Plaintiffs, across state lines; illegal access into Plaintiffs Liberi and Ostella’s computer systems, across state lines; and the other illegal activities of these Defendants. Defendants Orly Taitz and Neil Sankey must be stopped before, Plaintiffs Liberi; Ostella; their husbands; and children are physically harmed and/or killed.
Religious Insanity: It’s not just for our own dear fundies
Women in Saudi Arabia should give their breast milk to male colleagues and acquaintances in order to avoid breaking strict Islamic law forbidding mixing between the sexes, two powerful Saudi clerics have said. They are at odds, however, over precisely how the milk should be conveyed.
A fatwa issued recently about adult breast-feeding to establish “maternal relations” and preclude the possibility of sexual contact has resulted in a week’s worth of newspaper headlines in Saudi Arabia. Some have found the debate so bizarre that they’re calling for stricter regulations about how and when fatwas should be issued.
Sheikh Al Obeikan, an adviser to the royal court and consultant to the Ministry of Justice, set off a firestorm of controversy recently when he said on TV that women who come into regular contact with men who aren’t related to them ought to give them their breast milk so they will be considered relatives. …
Al Obeikan, who made the statement after being asked on TV about a 2007 fatwa issued by an Egyptian scholar about adult breast-feeding, said that the breast milk ought to be pumped out and given to men in a glass.
But his remarks were followed by an announcement by another high-profile sheik, Abi Ishaq Al Huwaini, who said that men should suckle the breast milk directly from a woman’s breast.
I am always dismayed when Birther opposition stoops to the level of Birthers.
If Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq. is to be believed (I know, it is difficult), her son has been harassed on Facebook, because of who his mother is.
Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq., while a serial liar, racist hate monger and ignoramus, who promotes violence and sedition on her web site*, who denigrates and humiliates the United States abroad, the country that took her in and gave her a mighty nice life, a disgrace to the legal profession and to humanity, who seeks to overthrow the United States government, to deprive me of the legally-elected president I voted for—she who never cares about other people’s children, be they dead or alive—has made herself an attention-whoring public figure.
However, her sons are private citizens who surely have enough to live down while making their way through life. If you like to think of yourself as better than Orly Taitz, don’t lay the sins of the mother on the children. Whoever is doing this, please, just stop it, it’s indecent.
I give some leeway, usually, to fools in love, having played one myself a time or two, but this latest affidavit filed by Lincoln in the forgery charges related to Rivernider v. US Bank, is a flat out pip of a story and says everything about the low character of both these Birfoons: They deserve each other.
Set in the back roads of the wilds of New Jersey, in the very opening hours of the Birfer love affair of the century, we have a man whose very soul cries out on the breeze riffling the treetops, I LOVE THIS WOMAN, ORLY TAITZ, (even if she is a vicious bitchbeast out of hell, “unusually intense and eccentric”), as he helps her along her way, from big town to small town, police station to police station, the pair of them on a mission to destroy the life of a Jersey Birther Girl, all the while, he says, without even knowing what evil he was about.
It’s a beautiful thing, yes, it is. Just see if it doesn’t pull at your heart strings. I can only regret they didn’t wander into some remote Jersey Troopers’ shack, this fine summer day, where they might have learned a finer point or two of Jersey justice.
On June 25, 2009, I was with Orly Taitz in Philadelphia, after the morning hearing in the case of Liberi v. Taitz. Pending before Judge Eduardo Robreno in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. …
I had begun working on the LIberi case with Orly Taitz on June 9, 2009.
Orly Taitz and I rented a car (my driver’s license, her credit card) after the hearing on Tuesday and we drove around New Jersey for the purpose of Orly making a police report concerning Lisa Ostella and to request her arrest and prosecution for fraud, forgery, and/or embezzlement of funds belonging to Defend Our Freedoms Foundations, Inc. of which Orly Taitz was President. Orly Taitz has accused several people of forgery (See Exhibit A).
Orly Taitz carried with her several copies of a very large file which, she said, contained the evidence of Lisa Ostella’s embezzlement and/or fraud.
I knew absolutely nothing about the allegations against Lisa Ostella or anything else to do with her. I did not examine the contents of the file at all.
Orly and I had been up all night the night before; the original purpose of our meeting was to prepare for the hearing but other things happened that night, and frankly I was energized and just delighted to be driving Orly around New Jersey: with someone with whom I had spent such a wonderful, romantic, night as the night before. I was in a rather happy daze at the time, which seems pretty ironic and stupid now, but even “during the moment” I recall thinking that Orly was at the very least unusually intense and eccentric.
We went to several towns and I cannot at the present time recall what those towns were, but we drove a very long circuit around New Jersey. I recall that we were basically driving in circles around Highways 1, 130, and 206.
I remember these highways between Princeton and New Brunswick because I used to visit friends at the Institute of Advanced Studies as well as the archaeology/anthropology and history departments at Princeton University and Rutgers University. But the towns Orly wanted to visit were all strange to me and I was so focused on Orly I wasn’t really thinking about the political geography.
We went to several police stations and each time Orly announced herself, requested to speak to a supervising officer, and offered one of her large (apparently duplicate) files concerning Lisa Ostella; Orly called her various “investigative files” by the term “Dossiers” but I am not sure which “Dossier” this was. However, the document she was circulating on that day might have been Orly’s “Dossier #6″, and if not, it was a very similar document. ..
Each time, the officer who received her file looked at the file and told her it was not in the proper form of a sworn complaint, and that it appeared to have to do with events in California which had already been reported to California police and/or Federal authorities.
I really wasn’t paying much attention, I admit, but Orly got angry and started arguments with officers at each point. I told her that it seemed futile to persist, but when we got to the third (I think) and final police station, (some nice suburban city center, surrounded by grass, I cannot remember the name but I can picture it in my mind) it was after 5:00 p.m. and all the day staff had departed.
Orly insisted on talking to someone. At first the security guard The officer politely told her it was out of their jurisdiction after which she started yelling. The officer was giving us very strange looks. I told him that she had been tlrrough a lot and he started to raise his hand as if to call time out or tell her to stop or something and I saw she was about to explode at him. I didn’t think that would have helped at all and I was mildly worried the officer might think Orly was disturbed or on drugs or drunk or something (especially because her eyes were bulging and bloodshot from lack of sleep, even though she had slept a little in the car during the day) so I grabbed her and kissed her and squeezed her and told her to calm down, which she did, and smiled, and finally we left, without having filed any reports anywhere. She whispered that the police were corrupt and stupid and it made her crazy. I told her “welcome to the world that I’ve lived in for twenty years.” …
It was, for me, more like a “lover’s picnic” (it was a very nice, beautiful day) than anything else. Orly was agitated while she was at the Police stations but not otherwise. Periodically she would get calls from her husband and apologize to me for speaking to him in Hebrew.
The above was submitted in a fresh avalanche of court filings yesterday:
Today’s segment arises from an interaction he had with a Birther on Facebook about yesterday’s:
Tony Sparrow: Charles why did you post that personal email to Orly on your website? I know you and Orly have fallen out but you had to realize that the Obots would get hold of anything you posted on your blog of this nature and use it to further undermine Orly and the eligibility movement. Which of course they now have. I’ve seen it posted on no less than 12 different Obot sites in the last 24 hours and it is only going to spread.
You bet your sweet bippy, Tony Sparrow.
I always wondered how a man of Lincoln’s education could have become involved in Birfoonery, and apparently, it took Orly to convince him the mofo in the White House was a usurpin’ mofo in the White House:
Let me make one thing clear: as much as I despised Obama’s politics and his proposals for more and more credit banks, including his July 2008 campaign promise for an Urban Development Bank, until I met Orly I never gave a second thought to the constitutional dimensions of his citizenship until I realized of what a vast pattern of compulsive lies they comprised but a tiny proportion. Orly convinced me that she was right, that this was a realistic crusade, and she enlisted my help. But from the very beginning she refused to listen to any concept of caution or hesitation.
Cue violin music:
Because I fell in love with her, I followed her orders blindly, and now see that she simply used me as generating machine to produce semi-coherent texts. She never wanted thought or analysis (certainly she did not want to participate in any). …
And so we became more and more deeply involved. By mid-October, when we were in New York together and Lucas Smith published his “declaration”, I had wrapped my life around Orly’s and I guess I honestly believed she had wrapped hers around mine and she said over and over again how much she was committed to me and how she never wanted us to separate. Three weeks later she had abandoned me, and yet some people have the nerve to call ME mentally unstable! I am honest about where I come from. Orly is not. Orly used her words and promises to induce me as long as she wanted and then she dumped me with no regard to her promises whatsoever.
The Awakening:
And all the while I see now that Orly, while constantly flattering me about my “intelligence,” and “scholarship” and “intellectual capacity”, avoided as much as possible any use of my brains which might have cautioned hesitancy or restraint of any kind. This is how she has gotten herself into so much trouble. Her modus operandi is speeding, in cars and in courts. Her constant counter-plea, whenever I asked for time to sift through the legal or factual material, was that to wait even a moment to engage in reflective thought or analysis would be to lose her followers, her supporters, and it was for their sake that I had to write without thinking, without adequate research or time, without allowing thoughts to sink in or mature.
While Orly’s hygienic concerns for her dental chair are apparently lacking, it’s nice to know she showers after sex.
Orly then, embarrassed by her setbacks, embarrassed by Lucas Smith’s incomprehensibly malicious initial disclosures (Orly knew he was staying in my house in September and could not help but notice that she was there and coming out of the shower before anyone else was up….day-after-day—so don’t accuse ME of incaution here!) But despite her rashness and impetuousity and lack of caution or care, Orly and now her supporters blame ME for the explosion of all this.
Her supporters never blame her for anything, Charles, you know that. She is held responsible for her irresponsible behavior never.
Now, love is blind and all that, but why this could be surprising news to anyone else is mind-boggling:
I fear I have to say she is a disloyal and treacherous person all around: personally, professionally, and ideologically her commitments to “higher values” must therefore be considered perhaps opportunistic at best. A woman who makes and disregards her personal commitments as lightly and honestly as Orly Taitz can hardly be trusted to lead a national movement. Anyone who betrays her professional duty to think to impress her followers, betrays quite possibly the best friend she ever had for the purpose of impressing her followers, and who will betray the essence of words like “love” and “forever”, cannot lead a movement dedicated to honor and integrity in government.
Your personal tribulations aside, Orly Taitz has told countless lies about President Obama and you helped. You might look to your own responsibility in this travesty and examine your own commitment to “higher values” and honesty.
Her constant counter-plea, whenever I asked for time to sift through the legal or factual material, was that to wait even a moment to engage in reflective thought or analysis would be to lose her followers, her supporters, and it was for their sake that I had to write without thinking, without adequate research or time, without allowing thoughts to sink in or mature. This is why we lost.
Well, you lost because you were wrong. But, even if we can accept that you, Dr. Lincoln, wanted to verify accusations she has made with researched facts, as you claim, you didn’t. You filed brief after brief after brief on her behalf, knowing full well the content was legally and morally indefensible. I cut you some slack, because you are no longer a licensed attorney, so she bears the bigger burden professionally, but as a human being, honestly, you suck as hard as she does. But it’s not too late. It might do you some good, in fact, to do a thorough and scholarly proof of the Birther claims made in the court papers you wrote out of blind, misplaced love; take a cold, clear look and see what conclusions you draw—in the name of truth and honor, of course.
For all of you Democrats exhausted with fighting other Democrats over health care reform, here is a brief respite out of Brifistan. It’s sort of related since it involves dental coverage, of a kind, and whether you are a bill-killing Deaniac, reliving your glorious past, or an Obot corporate sell-out, who wants to build on the bill, you can share this with your friends you’ve been battling with all last week. It’s Christmas, after all.
In this ongoing saga of lust, law and real estate, here is what Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq. did to Dr. Charles E. Lincoln, III, formerly Esq., with a notice from the court regarding one of their mortgage redemption cases, Lincoln v. Northwest (Wells Fargo) in Idaho:
She emailed him on December 9 about a court hearing where she appeared as his lawyer, (which she is trying to get out of), about the house he’s been evicted from in Rancho Santa Margarita CA. The case is related to Lincoln v. Silverstein, and is being heard in the Orange County Superior Court.
Parts of CEL3′s response to Orly’s email, depending on how hard-headed or soft-hearted you are, can be rather heart-rending, like this:
As I told you a thousand times if I told you once: you had re-awakened in my heart, body, and soul a hunger that I had allowed to die, a hunger for life and love and a woman’s companionship and touch. Without your voice, without your touch, without the feel of your beautiful smooth pale “blue-blooded” skin and the brightness of your eyes like bright flickering candles, ORLY, my life has gone dark indeed—very dark. I sit alone in the dark at night and miss you. I wake up in the mornings and wish you were coming through the door again as you did so many amazing mornings here. I want to hear you say you love me again, even if you say it in the softest whisper like you used to.
I am a total wreck without you (physically, emotionally, and yes, financially and professionally). And even if I hadn’t gotten sick, I couldn’t have faced you at court on Wednesday. Do you really want me to get that strength? I miss you too much, I love you too much, I need you too, too much. And really and truly, I need you in court even more than I need you in bed or in my life generally. I just need YOU Orly. …
You have left me so very alone and kind of helpless in the face of everything we started to create together. I counted on you. I depended on you. I believed in you and all your promises, even about helping me restore my health to something more than it is, which is pretty substandard. I never asked you for those promises but you repeated them often enough that I came to believe in them and rely on them, and for five months I was rebuilding my life around yours.
Heart-rending if you haven’t followed this tale. There is a startling truth buried in there, one surely meant to hurt her: “And really and truly, I need you in court even more than I need you in bed or in my life generally.”
And, in and out, he is threatening, like here, where he brings in Phil Berg and Lisa Liberi, who have been locked in combat with Orly in a Birther v. Birther lawsuit for much of the year:
The case in Idaho is still going strong, but it can’t go far without a “lead attorney”. I just need your loyalty, I just need for you to honor your commitment to me, and we can make great things happen. These cases are worth millions and millions of dollars, and I can do them if you’ll help me—or should I ask Philip J. Berg and Lisa Liberi to work with me? (They have been in contact with me and expressed a willingness to help me defend myself against your charges of forgery in Florida—you might as well know this—I have to defend myself as best I can—you are getting the “heads up” from me before anything and everything gets sunken into stone—I am not turning on you except to the precise degree that you turn on me, you know? …
Somehow, somewhere, there are lawyers who will help me, but my association with you has tainted me for life, especially if this is the last chapter, if you dump me here after making my name almost inextricably intertwined with yours. Is this fair? I am tarnished by you forever when you promised to build me up? When you promised you would do everything you could to build up my life again? Why are you deserting me this way after building up my hopes so
very much?
Well, he was pretty tarnished already, let’s face it.
Anyhow, if you’re going to withdraw from representing me against Silverstein based on CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, I think we’ll have to inform the Court hat the Conflicts of Interest really are, won’t we? You’re probably right, he’ll grant your motion to withdraw as my counsel, but is it worth it? Wouldn’t it be better for us to work together, really and truly?
Wouldn’t it be one thousand percent better? Do you really want to give up all our dreams and risk letting Philip J. Berg and Lisa Liberi outshine you on the mortgage front as some think they have done on the Obama front?
Ouch.
A reference to the fraudulent document situation in the Florida case, Rivernider v. US Bank, where Orly had accused CEL3 of signing court papers without her knowledge:
Even on the Florida case where you kind of sabotaged me, with all that crap about the First Amended Motion that you say you didn’t sign compared with the original motion that you admit you DID sign, Judge Dimitrouleas did not dismiss the case. …
It is just as ridiculous to say I can handle all the California litigation I took on believing that you would be working with me as it is to say that I forged your name or ever signed anything on your behalf without your permission. You’ve surely seen the unbelievable flood and rush of such forged motions I signed without your permission both before and after November 4, haven’t you?—Well, why would I ever have forged or signed without your permission an amended version of a motion which you ADMIT to signing? I didn’t forge anything, I didn’t sign anything without your permission, but since it was an amended version of a motion you admit you signed, WHY DO YOU CARE?
Again, the threat:
I feel disloyal to you when I am talking in a friendly manner to Lisa Liberi and Philip J. Berg, as nice and friendly as they are to me. But I am only doing this after and since you’re writing multiple letters Judge Dimitrouleas in Florida basically asking him to have me arrested and put me in jail….when you know I never did anything to hurt you at all….because I never could have done anything to harm you except in self-defense, although that’s the issue now: the law of the jungle and all that…..
I just know he’s going to sue the shit out of her:
You put me in a position where I’m overextended because I depended upon you and your promises to work with me and support me even. You had wanted me to be even more dependent on you because you wanted me to live at an apartment in Rancho Santa Margarita near your office where you could see me conveniently and without suspicious loss of time. You wanted me to have the window third of your office in Rancho Santa Margarita. You cleaned it out for me, you said it was mine, you set up computers for me in it. I made that my office address. I changed all my mailing addresses to YOUR office in Rancho Santa Margarita. …
All the promises you made to me about how we’d be working together and seeing each other forever. You even promised to cover my medical expenses, and a comprehensive health program with Dr. Ester Mark? Well, I ended up in the emergency room at noon on Wednesday because I couldn’t sit up. I felt like I was having a heart attack. I was very dizzy. I couldn’t drive and when she saw me to pick me up Renada didn’t want me to go to court with her so she took me to the Emergency Room.
So let’s see, you promised me a lifetime of professional collaboration with you as attorney for my estate trust and property management business in exchange for my support in your constitutional litigation. You promised me a free place to live and free medical care so long as I lived in Rancho Santa Margarita and would be your “boy toy” even though I resisted that, and said you should tell your husband about us, and that I preferred to live by the beach in San Clemente….which at 20 minutes is not that far from Rancho Santa Margarita except in the very worst of traffic jams.
You promised in particular first to protect, then to save, and finally to recover my house at 4 Via Corbina only in part because you wanted it to be our long! term “love nest”—4-5 minutes away from your office, again depending on traffic. And now you want to withdraw from that lawsuit?
This is all on his web site for the world and her husband to see:
And why have you made such a monstrous big deal about it? Let me guess: you promised your husband Yosi that you wouldn’t have any dealings with me after a certain day and then you did, but I’ll bet you didn’t tell him what we did on your dentists’ chairs on Tuesday November 3, of if you did, I’ll bet you didn’t describe it in much detail…..
I am most certain that Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq., on her road to disbarment, since she is the one of the two with the law license, has broken some rule of her profession in all of this, but I am not going to look it up. I gotta say, I have no sympathy for either of these miserable wretches. We’re seeing here what happens when a narcissist joins up with a sociopath. A pox on both of them. Still, I would be lying if I said there wasn’t a certain amount of satisfaction in seeing Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq. dragged through the mud as she has done to the President and his family.
So, as the well-trained, well-paid Alinskyite I am accused of being, I encourage Dr. Lincoln to call Kate Hampson or Payal Bawa, the producers of this documentary about Birtherism. Offer your Birther story, Charles. If NBC can interview Andy Martin, they can interview you. Don’t be a schmuck and let yourself be walked all over by this Bessarabian bitchbeast, who cares nothing for you. She wouldn’t bite you if she was starving, never mind drive 20 minutes to see you. Also call the National Enquirer—they have a lot of credibility with sex scandals and I hear they pay big.
CARACAS, Venezuela—President Hugo Chavez is praising Carlos the Jackal, the imprisoned Venezuelan once notorious for a series of Cold War-era bombings, assassinations and hostage dramas, saying he was a “revolutionary fighter” and not a terrorist. …
In his speech, Chavez sought to defend other leaders he said are wrongly labeled “bad guys” internationally, including Zimbabwe’s Robert Mugabe and Iran’s Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. Chavez called both of them brothers and said he now wonders whether Ugandan dictator Idi Amin was truly as brutal as he was reputed to be.
“We thought he was a cannibal,” Chavez said, referring to Amin, whose regime was notorious for torturing and killing suspected opponents in the 1970s. “I have doubts. … I don’t know, maybe he was a great nationalist, a patriot.”
Her former disbarred legal assistant, Charles Lincoln III, wishes to assure you, and a Judge in South Florida, she is. Thankfully, his language is less florid, his descriptions less anatomical, than Lucas Smith’s, who first made public (Page 9!) that the married Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq. was one hot momma for Charles Lincoln III.
You never know what goes on behind closed doors, and as I’ve said many times, all Birthers are low down rotten liars, so you can’t know who to believe in this he said-she said Birfoon romantic drama. If one, the other, or both filed false documents in the Florida court, who knows but them?
But, any close Birther-watcher will tell you that in June, or earlier, CEL3 started writing her Birther briefs, as he claims, and did personally file them for her at times, including when she was out of the country; and in November, suddenly, Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq. reappeared in the writing and it was noticed CEL3 was gone from the writing.
There is no reason to doubt a deal that she would front as his lawyer in his real estate redemption litigation. He lacked a law license and she had one. She needed litigation help in her Birther cases and he had more experience (God knows) in court.
Since July, and as late as November 15, her web site carried this ad with her phone number:
FOR ADVERTISING INFORMATION AND RATES CONTACT ORLY AT dr_taitz@yahoo.com
Hello Everyone, Jim the Webmaster here, I wanted to let you all know that Orly is offering legal services to help those in Foreclosure of facing foreclosure, email dr_taitz@yahoo.com for more information, put “FORECLOSURE” in the subject line of your email, Thank you.
Facing Foreclosure? Tired of Predatory Lending/Collection tactics?
Why not ask for Clear Title to your property NOW?
Even if you have lost your home in a non-judicial foreclosure sale or by summary judicial proceedings, it may not be too late to raise challenges to the systemic defects?
The Law Office of Dr. Orly Taitz*, Esq., has been designated as lead counsel of choice by Tierra Limpia/Deo Vindice Real Estate Research & Consulting of Austin, Texas, and Cambridge, Massachusetts, and now (in addition to other TL/DV programs) offers you a legal representation in its litigation program aimed at obtaining quiet title to your home and other real estate.
When the stakes are high and you cannot afford to lose…. When your home and land are what you want to fight for….
Protect Your Rights to Contractual Integrity and Private Property under Common Law and the Fifth Amendment.
The Law Office of Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq., is now engaged in mortgage redemption litigation.
IF YOU ARE GOING INTO FORECLOSURE, WE MIGHT BE ABLE TO HELP. CALL 949-683-5411
Posted on | September 28, 2009 |
I am attaching a college application essay by Charlie Lincoln, son of Charles Lincoln, Harvard educated PhD and JD from University of Chicago and a former clerk for 2 federal judges (including judge Reinhart from 9th Circuit court of appeals). Mr. Lincoln is advising me in both Obama eligibility and real estate matters.
Jeepers
September 28th, 2009 @ 10:12 am
Dr. Orly – How can you help me avoid foreclosure? Will Dr. Lincoln be doing the work through his companies? Please let me know.
dr_taitz@yahoo.com
September 28th, 2009 @ 11:57 am
I will be doing the work. Mr. Lincoln assists me in research.
Since she said herself in a radio interview last month that she paid him very little, it’s reasonable to believe him when he says their professional relationship was partly a work trade.
So now he feels betrayed because she left him, betrayed because she took his work and didn’t give back, and he is taking some brutal revenge.
Basically, Plaintiffs deny unequivocally that they have submitted any fraudulent documents or submitted any documents which they had any reason to believe might have been fraudulent nor in any way falsified to this Court, including the documents referred to by Dr. Taitz. If this Court is inclined to believe the “water has been sullied” by Dr. Taitz’ accusations to the point that this Court can no longer look dispassionately and objectively at the Plaintiff’s challenge to US Bank’s mortgage fraud in this case because of the tawdry state of affairs between one of the Plaintiffs and the Plaintiffs’ “attempted attorney”, then Plaintiffs move and request that this Court recuse itself rather than enter any further orders rulings in this case at all. Plaintiffs do not wish to endorse or condone the interjection of facts concerning marital infidelity or romantic vengeance as relevant factors in the evaluation of mortgage fraud or the validity of commercial paper assignments or of the assignment of civil causes of action, but they know of no other means of effectively explaining Dr. Taitz’ bizarre behavior.
9. What has happened here is that, much to our mutual discomfort I am sure, Orly Taitz and I had an intense but adulterous love affair, which continued until November 4, 2009. I can say nothing in our defense except that I fell in love with Dr. Taitz and she repeated on dozens of occasions that she loved me, but could not leave her husband because she did not want to lose “her children and her life.”
10. I am not proud of these facts, but put together they constitute the simple if unremarkably tawdry background against which Dr. Taitz’ behavior and accusations against me/all the Plaintiffs in this case must be judged and evaluated.
11. Dr. Taitz terminated our relationship in the aftermath of the October 12, 2009, disclosures made by one Lucas Daniel Smith on the internet which in rather grotesquely vulgar and sensationalistic manner revealed my love affair with Dr. Taitz to the world, and not coincidentally, to Orly’s husband Yosef Taitz, whom Orly had consistently described to me as viciously controlling, verbally and emotionally abusive, he is the kind of husband who will not allow his wife to speak freely at the dinner table or in front of her children or guests, and who becomes violently angry if his wife is not at home by sunset on the Sabbath for family/home prayer.
15. Dr. Taitz’s letters to the court and her Sunday November 15, 2009, communication to me by e-mail (a true and correct copy of which is attached as Exhibit A), are the acts of an extremely unhappy woman who got caught having an adulterous love affair by her husband and the entire world at the moment of maximum political and public exposure in her entire life.
20. As undignified, unprofessional, and unseemly as this Plaintiff’s exchange with Dr. Taitz may seem, it is merely reflective (at absolute worst) of this Plaintiff’s and Dr. Taitz’ emotional immaturity in the handling of their personal lives, and do not reflect on ANY of the other matters raised in Plaintiff’s Response to the Court’s Second Order to Show Cause and the Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss in any way, shape or form.
There is also an Affidavit attached from a psychologist friend of CEL3′s who claims contemporaneous knowledge of the affair and is also involved, in some way, with the mortgage redemption litigation scheme, as CEL3 posted on October 17:
Anyone interested in joining the class action against Wells Fargo, now is the time to get in touch with me or Peyton or Robert. Whoever is interested, please fax a copy of your NOTE and MORTGAGE CONTRACT to me in care of Dr. Kathy Lawson at 561-691-1423 along with any special notes/narrative you’d like to provide.
From Kathy Garcia-Lawson’s Affidavit:
9. In January-May of 2009, I became interested in the work of Dr. Orly Taitz against the constitutional eligibility of President Barack H. Obama. I made contact with Dr. Taitz who indicated that she lacked competent legal assistance in her litigation, whose end goal of removing the President I supported on moral, philosophical, and political grounds, and I suggested to her that she contact Charles Lincoln and see whether they could work together, which they quickly began to do.
10. Sometime in early-mid July 2009, Charles Lincoln confided to me in a late-night telephone call the he was involved in a very intense love affair with Orly Taitz as well as working for her constantly to the exclusion of everything else in his life. Charles said that he had been very lonesome since he separated from his wife Elena in late July 2002, and that Orly had made him “feel alive” and he believed that they could work together and accomplish things he could never do on his own.
11. Although he was calling me and updating me as a friend, that night Charles Lincoln at that time said he was very disturbed by the events, which had transpired with Orly, a married woman, and requested that I advise him as a psychologist. I spoke to Charles about Orly about 3-4 times a week after that, sometimes more.
21. I have wondered whether Orly’s involvement with Charles was strictly a result of her interest in using him on the Obama case, and I think that Orly may have been “leading Charles” on and that she never really intended to follow through on her commitments to the mortgage litigation.
You gotta wonder what Orly’s fundy supporters are really thinking about all this.
An interesting bit had to do with Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq.’s new lawyer, Jonathan Levy, who told Lincoln to expect a “strong and vengeful” return from Orly. The former Mrs. Charles Lincoln III could have told Orly a thing or two about how “strong and vengeful” her ex-husband could be, too.
I can’t imagine this judge, who has already threatened sanctions on both of them, won’t toss the case. He probably doesn’t need the aggravation from one disbarred in Florida lawyer and another who isn’t licensed to practice in the state. But if he bothers to write an opinion, it’s going to be a blast. Hold on to your hats.
Something I would like to know: Did Charles Edward Lincoln III have anything to do with Lucas Smith taking “Page 9″ public—(dated October 12, the Smith affidavit was posted to Scribd on October 22)—once she started to renege on the real estate redemption litigation partnership?
Or is it that Orly’s malevolent witch-hunting efforts to destroy the lives and careers of others has simply come back on her?
Anyhow, as Ed Brayton said after the Smith Affidavit was public: “It’s fun watching these slimeballs call each other names. I think they’re all correct.”
–
*Thank you to my friend LeonardApple for transcription services.
Affidavit In Birther Suit Contains Extraordinary Claims Against Orly Taitz
An affidavit from conspiracy theorist Lucas Smith filed in a now-dismissed Birther lawsuit details charges that attorney Orly Taitz, among many other things, asked Smith to perjure himself. The federal judge in the case has said he was “deeply concerned” about the charges, along with similar claims from at least one other prospective witness.
Lucas Smith, a Birther activist whose past claims have been debunked by even Birther-friendly WorldNetDaily, claims Taitz wanted him to falsely say in court that an incident where he was almost hit by a car in Los Angeles amounted to an “attempt on my life” by operatives sent by President Obama.
SANTA ANA, Calif., Nov. 11 (UPI) — California lawyer Orly Taitz, who contends Barack Obama wasn’t U.S. born and so can’t be president, denies she asked people to lie in court to support her case.
The Orange County Register reported Wednesday two people — one man claiming to have a certified copy of Obama’s Kenyan birth certificate and the other claiming to have been his homosexual lover — provided U.S. District Court with affidavits saying Taitz asked them to lie in court to bolster her case. One said she asked him to lie about the alleged birth certificate, reportedly determined to be a fake, and the other said she wanted him to testify that members of Obama’s church had been murdered.
Birther Lawsuit Witnesses: Orly Taitz Told Us To Lie
Among the allegations Smith makes is that Taitz asked him to say that he was the one who obtained a document that was alleged to be a 1964 Kenyan birth certificate for Barack Hussein Obama II. He says he didn’t. That document had been called a forgery by experts, and Smith said his own research also concluded that the document was fake. He also alleges that Taitz asked him to give false testimony about speaking to specific people in Africa, and that she asked two other people to lie under oath.
“It began to become clearer and clearer to me that Orly Taitz had no understanding of the law,” he writes. “I came to an exhaustive conclusion that Orly Taitz may be the ‘Birthers’ worst nightmare. Outside of paying attention to her own voice at length, Orly Taitz has the attention span of a small child.”
Smith also reveals that Taitz stopped speaking to him after he told people that she was sleeping with Charles Lincoln, a member of her legal team. And he describes in detail Lincoln, who has been disbarred in three states, relating his opinion of Taitz’s sexual performance.
Read the whole thing (warning: sexually explicit language).
Obama Birther Orly Taitz – hotter, hornier, wetter, tighter. It’s on page 9, I swear to God.
Oh, dear, now Orly’s alleged lover, (Page 9!), Charles Lincoln III, is all kinds of bent out of shape, because Orly’s allegedly betrayed husband won’t let her play anymore in Lincoln’s alleged mortgage redemption scam:
IF ONLY MR. YOSEF TAITZ HAD NOT THREATENED AND TERRORIZED HIS POOR INNOCENT AND OH SO UNWORLDLY WIFE….IF ONLY SOMEONE WOULD STEP FORWARD AND LEAD THE CHARGE
You may think that is me, ridiculing them, as the great Saul Alinsky taught me, but I did not bold that text. She surely has some bad Affidavit karma, though. Is CEL3 getting ready to sue Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq.?
Understatement: “This relationship did not end well.”
The uncertainty continued for about two weeks and finally on Wednesday night November 4, 2009, just before 10:00 p.m., Dr. Taitz called me by telephone informed me that she could never ever see me or speak with me or work with me again, that her husband had said terrible things to her.
Well, you were screwing his wife, allegedly, no?
Ah, well, maybe being the laughing stock of the universe is a goal.
I can only imagine. Maybe he is praying for the President’s death again and it’s a reason to smile for Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq. But maybe she is just so pleased he brought a few Birfer Negroes to her protest against Bill O’Reilly yesterday. Just to give her the benefit of the doubt. Because, after all, there would have been maybe three other people there, besides Orly, if not for the hate-mongering Rev. James David Manning of Harlem.
Here is what the Minister of Hate had to say in public: Apparently everybody was too busy having sex in 2008 to save the country from the Quasi Muslim-Freak Devil Long-Legged Mack Daddy. I don’t remember hearing about Bill Clinton having nookies on Hillary’s campaign plane before, but that’s what the Minister of Hate tells us.
Part 1
Part 2
There is a Part 3 and a Part 4, but it’s mostly Orly and the usual lying blah blah blah. This is when the white people get to speak. There is even a PUMA! A rare species anymore. Maybe that’s where Rev. Manning got the very PUMAesque theory that Hillary lost the primary because of her husband having sexcapades on her campaign plane. Also Bill O’Reilly has blonde concubines, just to remember why they were all there.
We also need to expose the corruption of wikipedia. They publish unbelievable garbage and gather each and every insult about the patriots, while not publishing any negative opinions about members of the Obama regime. Do they have headquarters? Who is the president and the CEO? Who sits on their board? All of them should be held accountable.
Oh, no, I see it now: From the Hawaiian word wiki, meaning “quick.” This can only mean Obama was quickly and slickly dipping his wick on Hillary’s campaign plane on a flight to Hawaii. No wonder she is his Secretary of State, that Blonde Concubine Short-Legged Mack Mommy!
Democratic NY-23 candidate Bill Owens is jumping to the defense of Dede Scozzafava, his Republican former rival who dropped out of the race and endorsed him against Conservative Doug Hoffman, following an attack on her by Rush Limbaugh.
Limbaugh declared today that Scozzafava was “guilty of widespread bestiality. She has screwed every RINO in the country.” Owens released this statement:
“This despicable attack on Assemblywoman Scozzafava offends me personally and exemplifies exactly what’s wrong with Hoffman and his right wing backers. Assemblywoman Scozzafava is an honorable public servant who has served Upstate New York as an independent and principled leader who always prioritized the best interests of Upstate New York ahead of a partisan agenda. Rush Limbaugh and the rest of the right wing special interests that are running Hoffman’s campaign can’t even begin to compete with what she has accomplished over her career.”
“Doug Hoffman and his supporters have sunk to a new low today. There is no excuse for this kind of shameful rhetoric and Doug Hoffman ought to denounce Limbaugh immediately.”
This is more ado than (unemployment + pig AIDS)^(two lost wars) combined. More ladies, on more golf trips, or Obama will be forced to show… his birth certificate? Is that what the controversy was here? It’s all a jumble.
For real, my first marriage ended, in part, because I didn’t want to do things like play golf and related boring things, like watching football games on television on Sunday. If I had to do it at my work, I’d have quit that, too. But then, my sister has been golfing for decades and I didn’t disown her for it. Am I sexist for that? Maybe, but if I have to start caring about crap like who the President of the United States golfs with, I may have to hang myself. Wonkette is right: It’s a jumble, not an outrage.
If women in government want to be on the golf course, get out there and golf, instead of whining to the New York Times:
“There is a sense that Obama has a certain jocular familiarity with the men that he doesn’t have with the women,” said Tracy Sefl, an adviser to Mrs. Clinton’s presidential campaign who speaks regularly to some female aides in the administration.
Oh, the humanity. What man doesn’t?
Presidential golfing is a long-standing tradition and I have no idea if they did it with women or without women. Just like about their birth certificates, did anybody ever ask if these guys golfed with women? Do we have to care?
Play golf with whomever you want, Mr. President. Get some fresh air and exercise. You’ve got a lot on your mind.
Most reputable sources gave the event numbers of 60-70,000 or thousands or tens of thousands. Disreputable sources wanted it to be 1.5 million to 2 million, so they said it was 1.5 million to 2 million. That was easy.
Conservative activists, who organized a march on the U.S. Capitol today in protest of the Obama administration’s health care agenda and government spending, erroneously attributed reports on the size of the crowds to ABC News.
Matt Kibbe, president of FreedomWorks, the group that organized the event, said on stage at the rally that ABC News was reporting that 1 million to 1.5 million people were in attendance.
At no time did ABC News, or its affiliates, report a number anywhere near as large. ABCNews.com reported an approximate figure of 60,000 to 70,000 protesters, attributed to the Washington, D.C., fire department. In its reports, ABC News Radio described the crowd as “tens of thousands.”
Brendan Steinhauser, spokesman for FreedomWorks, said he did not know why Kibbe cited ABC News as a source.
As a result of Kibbe’s erroneous attribution, several bloggers and commenters repeated the misinformation.
# have checked all of our coverage – ABC never reported 2 million. if you find it, send it to me. this is a total myth.about 11 hours ago from web
—–
# I don’t know where those numbers are coming from, but there’s no way there were 2 million there.about 11 hours ago from web
—–
# Tweeps, I’m confused. Keep hearing ppl say “ABC news is reporting 2 million” – where is this coming from? have not heard anyone say thatabout 11 hours ago from web
The Daily Mail published an article, “Up to two million march to US Capitol to protest against Obama’s spending in ‘tea-party’ demonstration,” which flooded right wing sites. A very similar Associated Press article entitled, “Thousands of downtown DC protesters blast Obama” was apparently based on the same scheduled press release, but updated to better reflect what actually happened.
I tend to think it’s both. Rep. Joe Wilson (R-SC) has always been a rude son of a bitch. And when he maintained a black daughter had no right discussing her white father, he proved he was a racist son of a bitch.
But it was the Republican Caucus who acted badly at the President’s speech on health care reform before the Congress. I don’t believe they are all racists, but I, too, have to wonder what makes it so easy for them to disrespect the President when he’s in their own house? Why are they so comfortable doing it? When are they going to pull themselves together and put a brake on their party’s rush to low-down, dirty, teabagger meanness?
Obama is president in the standard way. But his illegitimacy continues to be questioned by the “birthers,” who insist he is not a native-born American, who demand to see the president’s birth certificate, and then, when they see it, insist it cannot be genuine. Neither evidence nor facts will dissuade them because they are the throes of an irrationality based on bigotry. An American president must be — ought to be — white.
Some of the same ugly feeling was present in the House chamber Wednesday night. The lack of respect shown the president of the United States was both appalling and shocking. Rep. Joe Wilson (R-S.C.) yelled “You lie,” when Obama said that his health care proposal would not cover illegal aliens. Other Republicans held up placards saying “What Plan?” or “What Bill?” as Obama was speaking. The Party of Rudeness had outdone itself. …
But when the fringe starts pushing into the center, then attention must be paid. In general, the Republicans in the House treated Obama disrespectfully, and some of them treated him with contempt. When opposition to a piece of legislation turns swiftly into disdain for the man — when policy becomes personal — a columnist is permitted to wonder why. He is permitted, furthermore, to wonder if some of Obama’s more hateful critics are not expressing a repressed bigotry — the feeling that the man up on the dais cannot really be the president of the United States. After all, he does not look like one.
It would be an awful thing if genuine criticism was labeled racist and therefore muffled. But the disrespect shown Obama seems so disproportionate to the issue — health-care reform — that I just have to wonder. Wilson later apologized for his outburst, but he cannot take it back. It was, as has been said of another incident, a teachable moment. I hope he and other Republicans learn from it.
WASHINGTON — The nastiness of August reached from the nation’s town halls into the U.S. Capitol on Wednesday as President Barack Obama tried to move his health care plan forward.
South Carolina Republican Rep. Joe Wilson shouted “You lie!” after Obama had talked about illegal immigrants.
It wasn’t the only interruption during Obama’s speech to a joint session of Congress in the House of Representatives. Earlier, Republicans laughed when Obama acknowledged that there are still significant details to be worked out before a health overhaul can be passed.
Wilson’s outburst caused Obama to pause briefly before he went on with his speech. Overhead in the visitors’ gallery, first Lady Michelle Obama shook her head from side to side.
Palin, he says, paid more attention to Bristol and Levi’s baby, Tripp, than she did to her own baby, Trig, who was born with Down syndrome and became a symbol of hope for parents of special-needs children during the campaign. Says Johnston: “I couldn’t believe it when she would come over to us and sometimes say, playing around, ‘No, I don’t want the retarded baby — I want the other one’ and pick up Tripp. That was just her, even her kids were used to it.”
I guess this puts to rest, in a twisted way, the baloney about Trig Palin’s parentage, or surely Levi would have blabbed—but pee yew on this whole thing.
Mr. Obama as acting President of the united states did in fact receive letters from me explaining the illegal actions performed by the former President George Bush before Mr. Obama became President now that Mr. Obama is President he continued to violate my rights as an American Citizen under the Constitution of the United States by continuing to allow numerous government agencies and different branches of the military to perform psychological and physical warfare deemed to be illegal under any circumstances on American soil especially on myself an American Citizen who was offered a position as under cover cop by the former President. Therefore I am suing for 1.000.000 per day that I was tortured which is 1,264 days includeing being kidnapped comes to 1.264.000.000 Please be advised that additional law suits of 7.000.000 per week will be filed as I continue to be tourtered. My law suit is for attemped murder.
I thought “Death to Obama,” the President of the United States of America, was evil enough. I hadn’t noticed what the sign said below that charming thought. But now we have Recess Rioters wishing death on young children.
A man who was holding a sign reading “Death to Obama” Wednesday outside a town hall meeting on health care reform in Hagerstown, Md., has been turned over to the Secret Service.
Washington County Sheriff’s Capt. Peter Lazich said the sign also read, “Death to Michelle and her two stupid kids.”
Lazich said U.S. Secret Service agents took the unidentified 51-year-old man into custody Wednesday afternoon after deputies detained him near the entrance to Hagerstown Community College.
