Oh, For Goodness Sake

Liberi v.Taitz: Stay of Transfer–DENIED; FRIVOLOUS

Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq. can’t win for losing.

In the US District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania:

07/14/2010 133 ORDERED THAT DEFENDANT TAITZ’S MOTION TO UNSEAL THE TRANSCRIPTS (DOC. NO. 128) IS DENIED. THE HEARING TRANSCRIPTS ARE NOT SEALED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT DEFENDANT TAITZ’S MOTION TO STAY THE TRANSFER (DOC. NO. 128) IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDUARDO C. ROBRENO ON 7/13/2010.7/15/2010 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE AND E-MAILED.(amas) (Entered: 07/15/2010)

O R D E R

AND NOW, this 13th day of July, 2010, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant Taitz’s motion to unseal the transcripts (doc. no. 128) is DENIED. The hearing transcripts are not sealed.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Taitz’s motion to stay the transfer (doc. no. 128) is DENIED. The Court issued a rule to show cause as to why the case should not be severed and transferred, and thereafter ruled to sever and transfer the case under applicable law. All of Defendant Taitz’s other arguments are frivolous.

AND IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Eduardo C. Robreno

EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, J.

See also:

Liberi v. Taitz: Urgent

Taitz Files “Tantrum Wrapped In A Pleading”

Birthers v. Birthers: Berg Wants Sankey Back In California

Liberi v. Taitz–SEVERED