Oh, For Goodness Sake

The Birther Movement (And Other Follies) In The Age of Barack Obama–OFGS is now closed on weekends. Thank you.

21 Jul

The Winnah!!


On Politijab, we’ve been entertaining ourselves with a little contest: “The Stoopidest Thing Taitz Has Ever Done.”

I thought sure it had to be the time she went to the LGBT center to find out how to file nomination papers for the Republican Primary for California Secretary of State. But it was a tough choice. There was that affidavit about Judge Clay Land conspiring against her with Attorney-General Eric Holder in a coffee shop in Georgia. Announcing on September 12, 2009 that she’d have Obama out of office in 30 days. Instead of showing cause why she shouldn’t be sanctioned, showing cause why the sanction should be doubled. Claiming the President stole the Social Security number of a 109-year old dead man in Connecticut. Or that time she took two planes and drove a hundred or something miles to crash a speaking event in Idaho of the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States, leaving behind a suitcase full of Birfoonery, as she was hustled out the door. Filing not one, but two different Fake Kenyan Birth Certificates in courts in several states. Being the Jew at gun shows, hanging out with Nazis. There was the sex in the dental chair affidavit. The forgery trial in Florida when her ex-lover swore to their affair under oath, which she thought was “immaterial.” Or the one about the Pancake Painter and her vagina. I mean, where do you stop?

But leave it to Orly, bless her heart, she stopped it for us.

This right here has taken the cake, the pie, and the jelly roll.

TAITZ CALLS FOR SCOTUS TO ALLOW HER TO INVESTIGATE SCOTUS


REQUEST FOR VERIFICATION OF SIGNATURE OF JUSTICE THOMAS AND MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION IN RE APPLICATION FOR EMERGENCY STAY AND/OR INJUNCTION AS TO THE sanctions originally submitted to Justice Clarence Thomas

1 On July 8 2010 Application for stay of sanctions 10A524 was docketed with the Supreme Court and addressed to Honorable Justice Clarence Thomas.

2. On July 16, Friday 2010, around 9PM EST Applicant Attorney Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq (hereinafter Taitz) checked the electronic docket of the Supreme court, it showed no answer from Clarence Thomas.

3. On the same day Taitz has issued a press release, stating that there is no answer from Justice Thomas. Above press release was sent to some 28,000 media outlets and some 300,000 individuals.

4. On Saturday July 17, 2010 Taitz started getting comments on her website from some Obama supporters gloating about the fact that Justice Thomas dismissed her application. Originally, Taitz dismissed those as a dumb joke, but as those comments continued, she checked the electronic docket of the Supreme Court and to her amazement found, that somebody made a new entry on Saturday July 17, 2010, and backdated it for Thursday the 15th of July, stating that Justice Thomas dismissed her application.

Hahaha. The docket number was 10A56, you numbskull.

Points and authorities

Taitz cannot provide any points and authorities, as nothing like that ever happened in the Supreme Court and Taitz is requesting your Honor to review the above Motion as the matter of first impression.

Oh, dear God, help me stop laughing.

Relief requested

1. Taitz is requesting an appointment to visit the Supreme Court with a forensic document expert (to be identified at a later date) and view the orders pertaining to her cases and verify and clarify, that there is a valid signature of Justice Thomas and his clerk on the denial of application 10A56, entered on the Docket on Saturday 17, 2010.

2. Taitz is requesting an appointment to visit the Supreme Court with a forensic document expert and verify that there genuine signatures of all nine Justices on the denial of her case 08A524 discussed in conference on January 23, 2009.

3. Taitz is requesting your Honor to grant her and her computer security expert (to be identified at a later date) access to the electronic docket of the cases pertaining to her and her clients, in order to ascertain who made an entry in the docket 10A56 on Saturday, July 17, 2010 and who deleted the Application 08A 524 from the docket of the Supreme Court and whether such person was authorized to make such changes to the docket.

She’s copied half the goddamn United Nations, in case they want a peek into SCOTUS’s computer system, too, must be.

How the SCOTUS docket works:

The automated docket system is the Court’s case tracking system. It contains information about cases, both pending and decided. The docket provided on this page contains information regarding the status of cases for both the current Term and the prior Term. … Information on the docket is updated on the day after an entry is made on the docket.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Blogplay
  • Fark
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Buzz

Sorry, comments for this entry are closed at this time.