President Obama’s got an AV-rated ass-kicker representing him in this ballot challenge. Hearing today in the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania in Harrisburg:
KERCHNER v OBAMA – Letter to Clerk in Opposition of Testimoney via Skype
KERCHNER v OBAMA – Letter to Clerk
KERCHNER v OBAMA – Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Admission pro hac vice
KERCHNER v OBAMA – Motion to Strike and Dismiss
On February 5, Kerchner posted this announcement to his blog, explaining his aims:
CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret) Leading a Group of Citizens in Pennsylvania to File a Ballot Access Challenge/Objection to Obama
For the past several months CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret) has been researching and planning for a ballot access challenge/objection to be filed against Barack Hussein Obama II in Pennsylvania on the fact that Obama is NOT a “natural born Citizen of the United States” since his father Obama Sr. was a FOREIGN NATIONAL. Obama Sr. was never a U.S. Citizen, and was not even an immigrant to the USA. Obama is the first person sworn in (illegally and unconstitutionally) as the President and Commander in Chief of our military since the founding generation who were exempt from the natural born Citizen requirement via a grandfather clause in the Constitution whose father was a foreign national, was never an immigrant to this country, and was never a Citizen of this country. This is outrageous. He slipped through the cracks of the 2008 primary nomination process last time due to an enabling media not vetting him properly and which is covering up for him, a cowardly Congress, and a Republican Party establishment that wants to run their own ineligible candidates and are thus complicit in abrogation of Article II Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution. But he will be challenged every step of this way by We the People this time. He is not constitutionally eligible to be the President.
CDR Kerchner was the lead plaintiff in the lawsuit Kerchner et al v Obama & Congress et al brought by Atty Mario Apuzzo which was taken all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court, but turned away every step of the way by court created technicalities such as standing. In collaboration with Article II Super PAC, CDR Kerchner has gathered a group of plaintiffs and PA lawyers who plan to bring the challenge.
Here they all are filing the POS at the Chief Clerk’s Office of the Commonwealth Court of PA, on February 17:
Credit: CDR Kerchner's Blog
On February 27, Kerchner announced that BV-rated Birther lawyer Mario Apuzzo was joining the cause as co-counsel; however Apuzzo has been Denied pro hac vice status by the Pennsylvania court. Before PHV status was even determined, Apuzzo filed a 199-page brief.
For rebuttal, see Nolu Chan’s analysis here.
On February 23, Birther lawyer Phil Berg, who has not been disbarred in Pennsylvania, filed another challenge. Realist, a moderator at The Fogbow, summarized: “Kenyan birth, Grandma sez, Indonesian loss of citizenship, Never naturalized, et cetera.” This hearing is scheduled for March 19, in Philadelphia. As reported by The Western Center For Journalism: The United States Justice Foundation (USJF) is funding this project, and USJF Executive Director Gary Kreep will be co-counsel in this case.
Orly will be so happy.
The original Pennsylvania challenge, in the Western part of the state, was brought by Jim Schneller, an independent candidate for US Congress in PA-07. This will be heard today in Harrisburg, as well.
He got his, too:
SCHNELLER v OBAMA – Motion to Strike and Dismiss
SCHNELLER v OBAMA -Letter to Clerk
On February 27, he filed a second challenge, but it apparently has not yet been scheduled for a hearing.
Last year, the objector said of his 2008 ballot challenge:
“Once eight or nine courts toss it out (maybe it’s time),” he said. “It’s like an old pork roast in the freezer. Maybe it’s time to put it out for the trash man.”
Now Schneller seems to believe there is life in that old pork roast yet, even though 168 times, lower courts, Appellate Courts and the SCOTUS have put out the trash.
Court document links are courtesy of Jack Ryan Scribd.
See also:
Pennsylvania Ballot Challenge: Apuzzo Pro Hac Vice–DENIED
Taitz ‘Worse Enemy’ To Birthers Than Obama
Alaska Ballot Challenge: He’s Not White!!
Administrative Hearing–Judicial Trial: The Difference
Article II Super PAC Gives Orly Notice To Cease
Indiana Election Commission Observer’s Report
Indiana Ballot Challenge–DISMISSED
When A Paper Terrorist Meets A Paper Terrorist
GA State Rep. Asks To Postpone Presidential Primary
Farrar v. Obama: Petition For Letters Rogatory Filed
Farrar v. Obama: Taitz Pro Hac Vice–DENIED
Welden v. Obama Appeal Filed in Georgia
Farrar v. Obama, etc.: Final Decision–DENIED
Indiana Ballot Challenge, From Georgia With Love
Criminal Investigations For All!
Georgia Ballot Challenge Ruling
Who Is Residing In The White House?
Boots On The Ground In Georgia
Orly Taitz, Ass Backwards As Always
Georgia Ballot Challenge Official Transcripts
Has Orly Taitz Committed Perjury?
Farrar v. Obama: Motion for Letters Rogatory–DENIED
Editorial: ‘Birther’ nonsense makes state look idiotic — again
Atlanta GA: Fogbow Court Observers’ Report
Fogbowers Make The News In Atlanta
An Eloquent Plea Out Of Georgia
‘Birther’ lawyer doesn’t expect to see Obama
While The President Is Across The Country On Thursday
Farrar v. Obama: Subpoena-Palooza
Farrar v. Obama: Motion To Quash Subpoenas
Poor, Poor Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq.
Taitz v. Fuddy: Reconsideration–DENIED
Taitz v. Fuddy Video–This Hearing Was A Lulu
Riding The Taitz Train To Failure
Ankeny v. Gov. of Indiana Appeal Transfer: DENIED
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.