Oh, For Goodness Sake

eBay Hoaxster Lucas Smith Meeting With DOJ Today—Maybe

So says Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq.

Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq. has a hearing today in Georgia in her case, Rhodes v. MacDonald at Noon Eastern. I guess she is expecting it to be over pretty quick. She has also scheduled, according to a letter filed yesterday with the California court in Keyes>Barnett v. Obama, a teleconference with the DOJ lawyers four hours later.

I am sure if she is detained they can start without her, though. Her disbarred felon law partner, uh, legal assistant, Charles Lincoln III, and his assistant Peyton Yates Freiman, along with eBay hoaxer and convicted forger Lucas Smith, will be in the room.

First, regarding our scheduled telephone conference tomorrow, I will be available at 1:00 Pacific Daylight Time (4:00 Eastern Daylight Time) to participate by telephone, but my law clerks Messrs. Lincoln and Freiman, along with one of our key fact witnesses, Mr. Lucas D. Smith, will be at your office in person, which you have indicated is acceptable to you.

Oh boy, this should be a party. Let’s hope none of this crowd has outstanding warrants anywhere. Before we put on our dancing shoes, however, it would be nice to know the DOJ is expecting these visitors, which cannot be said for sure, not based on a court filing of Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq., as past experience proves.

She is sure Obama will be out of office in 30 days, this mental case:

In her letter, she actually says that no discovery can proceed before October 5, so she knows this, and she proposes deposition dates starting on October 19, when according to her, Obama will already have been hounded out of office.

Nevertheless.

She seems to think that Judge Carter ruled for expedited discovery at last week’s hearing, which he did not do. But she’s sure making like he did:

To: Josa

“I saw and spoke to Orly at the D.C. Rally on Saturday. She said that the judge had ordered discovery within 30 days.”

Same here…ran into her in the middle of the march and she was announcing to everyone that the judge ruled Friday for early discovery.

26 posted on 9/14/2009 4:11:09 AM by spacejunkie01

According to the Scheduling Conference Order issued by Judge Carter on September 8, basically in boilerplate, which describes what to prepare for regarding the October 5 Scheduling Conference:

Unless there is a likelihood that upon motion by a party the Court would order that any or all discovery is premature, the Court encourages the parties to begin discovery before the Scheduling Conference. The parties shall comply fully with the letter and spirit of Rule 26(a) and thereby obtain and produce most of what would be produced in the early stages of discovery, because at the Scheduling Conference the Court will impose tight deadlines to complete discovery.

Requiring:

(6) a discovery plan, which should set forth discovery phases, the order of discovery, and any limitations on discovery.

Since the Defense has filed a Motion to Dismiss challenging the court’s jurisdiction, and this is to be heard the same day, but before the Scheduling Conference, on October 5, it would seem to me that there might be “a likelihood that upon motion by a party the Court would order that any or all discovery is premature.” Furthermore, there is an Application for a Stay on Discovery until after Judge Carter’s October 5 ruling on the Motion to Dismiss, which Judge Carter has not yet decided. This was filed by the Defense on September 10.

Also, the second point sounds like actual discovery takes place in the future. And I’ve seen nothing from Judge Carter granting early discovery.

Even if Judge Carter is asking that whatever discovery can be gotten out of the way be gotten out of the way in the initial disclosure stage, Rule 26(a) relates to documents or other tangible material in possession of the two sides; the names and contact information of witnesses expected to be called in the course of a trial; and the pertinent facts a witness would depose. Otherwise, the initial disclosure phase does not involve witnesses present. But, who knows, the DOJ lawyers may be glad to see him.

Developing… I guess.

What the letter does show is that Charles Lincoln III, who has been among the missing and the object of some contention in the Birther rank and file, is totally back in the game. Now if they can just get Larry Sinclair back to California.

The less known in Birther world, Peyton Freiman turned up recently as part of the new “legal team” touted by Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq. for whom she raised money and goods to house and feed, from among her acolytes, but the 26-year old artist has been associated with Lincoln for several years.

Freiman is also involved in the mortgage redemption business of Lincoln and Taitz, as advertised for an upcoming website:

This will be the place to get help and information about saving your home from forelcosure. Still under Robert’s Rules of Orderly Construction, so be patient. If you need help now please contact—-mailto:admin@charleslincoln.spiritualpatriot.com or see www.orlytaitzesq.com (we have programs available at several different prices both with and without formal legal representation in court which are available to every person who needs help vindicating their title or redeeming property from or even after foreclosure.

Peace be with you and Pax Vobiscum, Robert Ponte: (860) 599-5557 or Peyton Yates Freiman (512) 923-1889 (freimanthird@gmail.com).

Perhaps if the DOJ has time on its hands, they can look into this little arrangement.

Also in the letter is a promise of a Second Amended Complaint. Can’t wait.