Orly Taitz Lining Up Yucks For RICO Attack On Media
Orly’s web page frolics become more and more frenetic since her alleged adulterous, amorous activities were displayed on Scribd at page 9.
From among her various witch hunts, Dr, Orly Taitz, Esq. has plucked an associate publisher/editor of a trade publication, who dared to deny her Birfer Queenn-ness an article about Birferism in a magazine about paper, film and foil conversion:
Get a life and stop wasting our tax dollars on ridiculous lawsuits. Maybe the country should sue you.
Such a good idea. Surely, there is a retired lawyer or judge, livelihood no longer at risk, who would do this patriotic service and rid the nation of the meddlesome bitchbeast.
No doubt this trade publisher will feel the wrath of Orlybots, if there are many left.
It seems to have sprung from this particular witch hunt:
When will you rise and demand removal of Anita Dunn from her position as White House Communications Director? Do you want these Nutcase Maoists pulling a cultural revolution in this country? Rounding you up in camps for re-education?
After all:
I am starting to get responses to 20,000 mailers to the media. Many want to know the truth. Some are completely brainwashed by the Obama regime propaganda. We have to get discovery, to show the truth to reporters like one below.
Dear Yolanda Simonsis from penton.com
I am fighting, so pinheads like you will have a freedom of speech and a freedom of information and a real transparency in government, and will not be sent to a FEMA camp at Fairbanks Alaska for re-education based on orders of Maoist Anita Dunn and her boss Kenyan Communist Dictator Obama.
Orly lets the media know what is ahead for any who dare challenge her Birfer Queenn-ness:
I will be exposing to you [Orlybots] all of the reporters and media executives, who don’t want to know the truth about Obama’s illegitimacy for presidency and don’t want to report the truth to their readers, therefor actively defrauding their readers.
RICO fraud is Orly’s latest pie in the sky to keep her Birfoon followers distracted enough from her massive failures in court, so they keep pressing that PayPal button and come up with the $20,000 she has, so far, been fined for misconduct.
I currently don’t have time to research and therefor need help from my supporters. I remember there are specific statutes in Federal Communications Act and Federal Elections Committee, where members of the media that are defrauding the public in relation to the elections, can be held liable. I need quotes of the specific statutes. I will be reporting the names of the editors and reporters,who refuse to report on eligibility cases and January 26 trial. It might be necessary to join these members of the media as additional defendants in RICO (Racketeering Influenced Corrupt Organizations) action.
She doesn’t have time for research. She is too busy with Charles Lincoln III, her disbarred legal assistant, whose young assistant is also too busy. They are all three very, very busy running a “real estate redemption” litigation scam—oh, dear, I’m sure I meant to say “real estate redemption” business or service, whatever it is when trusting homeowners sign away ownership of their homes to con artists like these.
Perhaps the Penton publishing group can send one of its real estate experts for one of their trade publications to investigate. It’s easy to sign up for Politijab, too, where the real estate redemption research of the firm of Taitz, Lincoln is already being done. Any member of the press or the public is welcome to register and participate or just read all about this woman’s psychodramatic waste of taxpayer money, assaulting the courts, disgracing the military, harassing state bureaucracies, invading the privacy of ordinary citizens, and inciting the overthrow of the government.
This is what she is up to when she isn’t doing that, and no more successfully than she has been in her Birther cases.
In a “class action” lawsuit brought by Taitz, Lincoln in the United States District Court in Idaho, Lincoln v. Northwest, Wells Fargo’s Defense has filed a Response to a Motion for Continuance with a strong objection to Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq. as substitute attorney. The Response includes as Exhibit A a copy of the 43 page Order issued by Judge Clay Land In Georgia, which sanctioned Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq. $20,000 for misconduct in Rhodes v. MacDonald.
The admission of a lawyer pro hac vice is governed by the Court’s Local Rules, and it is the rare case where a litigant would ordinarily inject itself into the Court’s consideration of a request to modify the application of those Local Rules. Given the history of Ms. Taitz in appearing pro hac vice in other actions, however, Wells Fargo must object to any waiver of this Court’s Local Rules requirement that she obtain local counsel as a condition of pro hac vice admission.
The Court’s Local Rule on pro hac vice admission, by requiring local counsel, serves several admirable purposes. Not the least of these is a local contact for service, but also a local contact who is familiar with filing procedures, Local Rules, and protocol. All of these things serve to allow the efficient administration of a case, and accordingly minimize the cost of litigation. The participation of local counsel also tends to moderate the behavior of those who would otherwise feel little concern for the consequences of frivolous claims or conduct if they knew they would not be soon appearing again in a local venue. When the Court is satisfied that a counsel admitted pro hac vice is capable of practicing without such local advice and counsel, the rule requiring appearance by local counsel at all hearings can certainly be waived.
Ms. Taitz has a troubled history of pro hac vice appearances. She was recently sanctioned by Judge Clay D. Land of the Middle District of Georgia (Columbus Division) and fined $20,000 for her conduct in a case where she was admitted pro hac vice and received a waiver of the local counsel requirement. A true and correct copy of this decision is attached to the Affidavit of Kenneth C. Howell Regarding Motion for Continuance, filed concurrently herewith.
Judge Land specifically rued the waiver of local counsel requirement, noting that it “was a mistake as counsel abused her pro hac vice privileges.” See Affidavit of Kenneth C. Howell Regarding Motion for Continuance, Exhibit A at p. 7-8. Ms. Taitz’s abuse of her pro hac vice privileges in the case before Judge Land in Georgia foreshadow her expected abuse in this action given the meritless claims advanced by Plaintiff. This is particularly true with respect to the present Motion for a TRO given that the relief requested is moot, and given that Plaintiff is unable to meet the standards for granting a TRO.
Any granting of a waiver of the Local Rules’ requirements of local counsel is likely to have the direct effect on Wells Fargo of a substantial increase in the cost of defense of this action, and will result in additional delay in the resolution of this action. Given that Plaintiff’s prospective counsel is already unable to attend to this long-scheduled hearing, it is reasonable to expect that her involvement in “other high-profile litigation” will cause additional delays – and additional cost to Wells Fargo — throughout the course of this litigation.
Nice one for the Defense.
Her reputation begins to precede her. Good.
From the Complaint by Taitz, Lincoln:
17.And all the little Oysters stood and waited in a row. “The time has come,” the Walrus said “to talk of many things: of shoes and ships and sealing wax, of cabbages and kings.”
18.Like every one of the Oysters in Lewis Carroll’s “The Walrus and the Carpenter” from Through the looking glass and what Alice found there (1872), the mortgagors in the United States have been tricked by false promises and lies and asked to walk along the beach, only to be summarily eaten by the mortgage companies, their servicers, and the courts and county sheriffs who have supported them.
19.“The Sun was shining on the sea, shining with all its might…. and this odd because it was the middle of the night.”
This model of legalese also appears in Lincoln v. Cal-Western Reconveyence, a duplicate case before Judge David O. Carter, who is currently deciding a Motion to Dismiss in Barnett v. Obama, in Santa Ana, California.
In August, Judge Carter also denied Taitz as attorney in a Minute Order, without giving his reasons, as far as I am aware.
08/05/2009 27 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER Denying Motion for Appearance as Counsel and Granting Extension of Time to File Second Amnended Complaint 26 . The Motion is DENIED to the extent that it requests that this Court recognize Orly Taitz’s appearance as counsel for Plaintiff. To the extent that the Motion requests an extension to 09/15/2009 for Plaitniff to file his Second Amended Complaint, the Motion is GRANTED. (db) (Entered: 08/05/2009)
And in Florida, Rivernider (and Lincoln) v. U.S. Bank National Association, where a Motion to Substitute Counsel for Pro Se Litigants and Motion for Additional Time to Respond to Motion to Dismiss was denied this past Friday, because they never follow the Rules.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiffs’ Motion to Substitute Counsel for Pro Se Litigants and Motion for Additional Time to Respond to Motion to Dismiss [De-13] is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to file a motion that complies with the requirements of S.D. Fla. L.R. 7.1.A.3., which requires the moving party to certify that he has conferred, or describes a reasonable effort to confer, with the parties affected in a good faith effort to resolve the dispute. Said motion should be filed on or before October 30, 2009.
This is just great, what with the same case in three states, and she has no idea of what she is doing:
The undersigned attorney submits that she is unfamiliar with many aspects of this case at the time of filing of this Motion…
Taitz, Lincoln has until October 30 to refile in Florida; let’s see if they do it.
Lincoln is disbarred in Florida and Taitz, in 49 out of 50 states, including Florida, has no license to practice law, so local counsel has to be found to front for her before pro hac vice status can be granted. Complicating that is a required dispute resolution conference before any such motion can be filed for Taitz to join the case, in which conference she would not be allowed to participate before she is granted pro hac vice status. Wouldn’t Taitz, Lincoln have known this before filing the papers? Sure, but filing frivolous court papers is what they live for.
The paper terrorist firm of Taitz, Lincoln intends to bring this mortgage redemption POS to courts all over the United States. Coming to your state sooner or later. If ever tempted, I hope homeowners would read this from the National Consumer Law Center: Dreams Foreclosed: The Rampant Theft of Americans’ Homes Through Equity-Stripping Foreclosure “Rescue” Scams
It strikes me that there is an awfully good story here for an enterprising reporter to start plumbing. Again, that’s Politijab, but you have to register to see the good stuff.
Sorry, comments for this entry are closed at this time.