Oh, For Goodness Sake

Berg Wants To Bring Case Against Orly To Her Backyard

The Birther v. Birther case, Liberi v. Taitz, in Philadelphia, has been pretty quiet for a while, though court filings have been made, but it may be bumping up against the dismissed Barnett v. Obama in California, as a result of a despicable letter sent to Judge David O. Carter by Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq.

On Tuesday, Berg filed a Request for Judicial Notice with the Third Circuit Court of Appeals in Pennsylvania, where an appeal of a denial in the District Court of a Temporary Restraining Order is pending in Liberi v. Taitz:

12/08/2009 ECF FILER: Appellants’ Request for Judicial Notice; Certificate of Service; and EXHIBITS 1-4 filed by Appellants Evelyn Adams, Philip J. Berg, Go Excel Global, Law Ofc of Philip J. Berg, Lisa Liberi and Lisa M. Ostella. Certificate of Service dated 12/08/2009. (PJB)

Here is the letter Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq. had written to Judge David O. Carter, who dismissed her case, Barnett v. Obama on October 29. He denied her Amended Motion for Reconsideration in a December 4 Minute Order, with no mention of the letter, which was dated December 2.

Berg had previously applied to have his case moved to the Southern Division of the US District Court of California, a decision on which is pending, after Taitz submitted there a scandalous account of Lisa Liberi’s family life in one of Taitz’s crazy dossiers. At that time, Berg wrote to Judge Carter to complain and Carter ordered Taitz to resubmit after redacting Liberi’s personal identifying information.

09/30/2009 77 MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER held before Judge David O. Carter: On 09/28/09, Court received letter from attorney Philip J Berg requesting Exhibit 7 to Response in Opposition to Motion 69 be sealed as it contains personal identifying information(see Order for specifics). Court orders Plaintiffs Opposition to Motion to Dismiss Case (Doc 69) sealed. Plaintiffs shall refile redacted copy of entire Opposition to Motion to Dismiss, including all exhibits by Friday, October 2, 5 p.m. (ln) (Entered: 09/30/2009)

In the letter from Taitz to Judge Carter filed on December 3, she did it again! (Sanctions, Judge Carter, sanctions.)

Berg writes:

Neither Appellant Liberi nor Appellant Berg have anything to do with the Barnett case filed in California and the only reason these documents have been Filed by Appellee Orly Taitz, et al is to use the Federal Docketing System to further her illegal, harmful, damaging behaviors towards Appellant Liberi, Appellant Berg and any party associated with them. It is imperative that this Court take Judicial Notice of these documents as it shows the continued deceptions, fabricated statements and stories and dishonesty of Appellee Orly Taitz, et al as the statements made by Appellee Orly Taitz’s in this letter contradict her statements and filings to Judge Robreno in the lower Court, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania. In addition, this letter of Appellee Orly Taitz’s also proves the allegations which Appellants’ have pled against her and the other Appellees herein.

Moreover, Appellants’ requested Leave from Judge Robreno in the lower Court, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania on November 29, 2009 to file their Motion requesting Transfer of the within Diversity Action to the United States District Court, Central District of California, Southern Division located in South Orange County at 411 West Fourth Street, Santa Ana, CA 92701-4516 with telephone number (714) 338-4750, see which is the very Court that Appellee Orly Taitz, et al filed this December 2, 2009 letter. Thus, Appellants’ are concerned that Appellee Orly Taitz, et al may be attempting to conflict out the Judges in the United States District Court, Central District of California, Southern Division.

So Berg thinks Orly submitted this letter in her case in order to prejudice the California court against his case, in the event a transfer is granted. Personally, I don’t think Orly is smart enough to think of it on her own, but when she was still hooked up with CEL3, I can see him recommending such a devious course of action. She could have decided, once on her own, to move ahead with it, I guess.

At the end of October, when Taitz, Lincoln were still an item, Berg filed a series of Judicial Notices with the Pennsylvania Court:

10/31/2009 Open Document ECF FILER: Request for Judicial Notice of Judge David O. Carter’s September 21, 2009 Order filed by Appellants Evelyn Adams, Philip J. Berg, Go Excel Global, Law Ofc of Philip J. Berg, Lisa Liberi and Lisa M. Ostella. Certificate of Service dated 10/31/2009. (PJB)

10/31/2009 Open Document ECF FILER: Request for Judicial Notice of Judge Clay D. Land’s October 13, 2009 Order and two (2) Articles re Orly Taitz Defiance filed by Appellants Evelyn Adams, Philip J. Berg, Go Excel Global, Law Ofc of Philip J. Berg, Lisa Liberi and Lisa M. Ostella. Certificate of Service dated 10/31/2009. (PJB)

10/31/2009 Open Document ECF FILER: Request for Judicial Notice of Judge David O. Carter’s October 29, 2009 Order filed by Appellants Evelyn Adams, Philip J. Berg, Go Excel Global, Law Ofc of Philip J. Berg, Lisa Liberi and Lisa M. Ostella. Certificate of Service dated 10/31/2009. (PJB)

10/31/2009 Open Document ECF FILER: Request for Judicial Notice of Larry Sinclair’s Affidavit and Exhibit A to Larry Sinclair’s Affidavit filed by Appellants Evelyn Adams, Philip J. Berg, Go Excel Global, Law Ofc of Philip J. Berg, Lisa Liberi and Lisa M. Ostella. Certificate of Service dated 10/31/2009. (PJB)

So maybe Orly felt it was payback, even though her submission was completely irrelevant to the California case. But whatever. Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq. has gotten away with her vile behavior again and again, with Berg’s clients, and with others, perfect strangers who are totally unconnected to anything. I hope she burns for it.

So best of luck to Philip Berg and Lisa Liberi (in this matter only).