Oh, For Goodness Sake

Taitz: “The most important legal actions this Nation has ever known”

Her grandiosity knows no bounds.

Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq. has lied many times, about many things, and consistently about whether she riles up her followers to pressure the courts. She’s even lied about it to a federal judge and about a federal judge.

Judge David O. Carter wrote in his dismissal of Barnett v. Obaama:

The hearings have been interesting to say the least. Plaintiffs’ arguments through Taitz have generally failed to aid the Court. Instead, Plaintiffs’ counsel has favored rhetoric seeking to arouse the emotions and prejudices of her followers rather than the language of a lawyer seeking to present arguments through cogent legal reasoning. …

Taitz encouraged her supporters to contact this Court, both via letters and phone calls. It was improper and unethical for her as an attorney to encourage her supporters to attempt to influence this Court’s decision. Despite these attempts to manipulate this Court, the Court has not considered any outside pleas to influence the Court’s decision.

Before that, at an October 5 hearing, he told her:

Ms. Taitz, if you can control the phone calls. I leave that to you. If not, I want to assure you I’m not accepting any of those phone calls. They’re simply going into an answering machine and being deleted by the secretary. I’ll just say to you I don’t think that that was helpful putting on an internet blog that you thought that people could influence the Court by calling them. It was inappropriate.

And:

I can assure you that during these proceedings, President Obama hasn’t called me, thank you, and applied any pressure, nor has any member from the government, but I can assure you Ms. Taitz, that somethings happened that will not affect my decision, but it is troubling. And that is apparently on your blog you encourage people who subscribe to your blog to contact the courts. We’ve absorbed 40 to a hundred phone calls a day on occasion. You have to be careful, and I assure that it doesn’t — it has the opposite effect.

If there’s any improper pressure or effort, it’s coming because you requested members of the public to literally call the court and give their input.

She is at it again*, even though this is very likely one of the points of unprofessional conduct and contempt the California Bar will be interested in.

What you can do

Posted on | February 15, 2010 |

A number of people have asked me, what can ordinary citizens do to help me aside from donating

Here are some things that can be done:

1. Amicus Curiae- Friend of the Court

this is a brief that is filed with the court, addressing the judge and supporting a party in an ongoing litigation. While typically Amicus Curiae is written by an attorney, there is no law saying that it has to be written by an attorney. Any citizen can write it.

You put on top a caption of the case . You write your name and write “Motion for leave of court to file attached Amicus Curiae”. You attach your brief or letter, titled Amicus Curiae, and you provide all law, constitutional provisions and any facts, that can help the judge to achieve just decision that first and foremost upholds the rights of “We the people of the United States of America .” The judge will decide whether he will include it in the docket, in which case the other party can respond and the judge will give it weight in his opinion. Unfortunately in both Land and Carter cases the judges have included garbage information that they received, perjured affidavits and included in their orders reference to that garbage without giving me an opportunity to respond. When I asked judge Carter for investigation, I didn’t even get a reply. That was wrong.

You can send your briefs to

1. US District Court for the District of Columbia Taitz V Obama 10-CV-00151 333 Constitution Ave, NW, Washington DC 20001-2858

2. Nineth Circuit Court of Appeals in S. Francisco Barnett et al v Obama et al

3. Elevent Circuit Court of Appeals in GA Cook v Good et al

(on behalf of Major Cook, Attorney Orly Taitz)

Rhodes v McDonald et al

(asking to reverse $20,000 sanctions)

She even has set her flying monkeys out after the Bar Association.

4. You can write to CA Attorney’s Bar, investigator Robin Littlefield, Office of the trial counsel, letting them know that my Legal Actions on behalf of Major Cook and Captain Rhodes, where Judge Clay D. Land presided, were not frivolous, but probably the most important legal actions this Nation has ever known and CA Attorneys’ bar needs to act not as a tool of the Democratic party, not as a political hack, but as an organization devoted to upholding the Constitution and rule of law and needs to stand up and support me, and provide me with legal and financial help in all of the above cases.

Just the sort of thing she has sworn she does not do.

During the October 5 hearing in the above mentioned case Judge David O. Carter stated that I encouraged my supporters to call him.

I declare under penalty of perjury that this is not true.

Many examples can be found here of what Judge Carter was talking about. But she will deny all of it. Will the Bar Association Disciplinary Committee care that she lied to a federal judge and then called him a liar under penalty of perjury? Perjury is a felony and reason for disbarment. I’m not sure of the particulars the Disciplinary Committee is looking at related to a February 26 response Orly is supposed to make, but I am hoping this is one of them.

–

*No longer linking to her web site.